@Not Quite Dead Actually, I think your version of him (and the artwork that your version is based on) is much better looking than the canonical description of how he is suppose to look.
Sometimes what is non-canonical is better than what is canonical, and sometimes it's the other way around. And then there those cases where someone takes something that is permanently established as canonical, radically redesigns it to the point where it no longer even comes close to being canonical, and, then, tries to claim that the new radically different design is canon (without giving any canonical reason as to why), also claiming (through implication) that the previous design should no longer be considered as canon even though it's not possible to do that.
An obvious example of this (and the case in the point that I'm trying to make) is the design of the Klingons in "Star Trek Discovery". They look nothing like Klingons, they look more like Japanese Oni demons.
Anyway, back to the Baal-Pteor miniature. I haven't acquired him, yet, because I have only just learned of his existence, so I can't examine the miniature myself, but what is up with the sculpting of his loin cloth. Not that I personally have a problem with it (because I don't), but it looks as if he was purposely sculpted to look well endowed. Am I mistaken about this observation?
